What the corpus examines

Two measurements of the same 136 episodes, and both of them ask one question: when this show raises a subject, how often does it go and look?

Every number here is re-derivable. The ratio rows print the regular expression that produced each side, and the ledger counts a document as retrieved only when it was actually opened.

This page used to carry the whole project on one screen — the method, the anomaly sites, Mars, the guest research and the portfolio, stacked under a single heading. They were never one investigation. The rubric now lives on method, the sites in the anomaly atlas, the Mars claims in the Mars ledger, the guest work in prep cards, and the shipped software in cases.

How often the corpus discusses a thing, against how often it examines one

Both sides of each row are episode counts over the same 136 episodes, produced by one regular expression each, so any reader can re-run them and get the same number.

episodes measured136
pairs4
widest gap27.0times more episodes discuss the topic than examine the evidence for it
Discussedeps Examinedepsgap
Reverse-engineering recovered craft reverse[- ]engineer|back[- ]engineer|legacy program 81 The one material with a published isotopic analysis (Ubatuba) ubatuba 3 27.0×
Crash retrieval programmes crash retrieval|recovered (craft|vehicle)|legacy program 65 Peer review, mentioned at all peer[- ]review 24 2.7×
Evidence, as a word \bevidence\b 119 A FOIA request or a declassified document, named \bfoia\b|freedom of information|declassified 51 2.3×
Telepathy as a mode of contact telepath 52 A replication or a control group replicat|control group|double[- ]blind|preregist 49 1.1×

This is not an argument that the show is careless. It is the measurement a researcher would want before pitching: the gap between what a subject is discussed about and what has been examined is exactly where an unclaimed story sits, and it is where the one material with a published analysis turns out to say the isotopes were terrestrial.

The patterns are printed with the counts because a ratio whose definition is hidden is rhetoric. Change the regular expression and the number changes; that is the point.

Every document the show has ever cited, in one index

362 hours of conversation turned into a research index with an identifier per row and an honest retrieval rate — something the show itself does not have.

documents named122
identifier is real112
actually retrieved8368% of named, 74% of real
named but unretrieved39a work plan, not a gap to hide

The rule that makes the index worth anything is that named and retrieved are different states and are never blurred. A document that could not be opened is marked unretrieved and stays in the count, which is why the rate is reported against both denominators rather than the flattering one.

The unretrieved list is the most immediately useful output of the whole project: it is an ordered week of archive work, sorted by how often the show already relies on each document without anyone having pulled it.

Cited most, read least

Ranked by how often the corpus already leans on a document it has not opened. This is the ordered week of archive work.

  1. 01

    Project Blue Book files

    USAF Project Blue Book records (NARA Record Group 341 / microfilm; Fold3 / NARA releases)

    Archive collection real; not bulk-retrieved this session. cited heavily across corpus.

    25citations
  2. 02

    Newton–Gebauer fraud court case

    U.S. criminal case against Silas Newton and Leo Gebauer (1950s fraud related to alleged UFO tech — exact docket not spoken)

    Historically attested prosecutions; CourtListener search not completed this session.

    25citations
  3. 03

    Grusch congressional hearing / UAP hearing testimony

    House Oversight Subcommittee hearing "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security…" 26 July 2023 (Grusch, Fravor, Graves)

    Hearing is real public record. Full official transcript/video not pulled this session — retrieved:false.

    13citations
  4. 04

    AARO / All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office report

    AARO Historical Record Report, Volume 1 (DoD, March 2024) — corpus also refers to the office generically

    Office and public historical report are real. PDF not scraped this session.

    7citations
  5. 05

    Aquarius document

    Alleged AFOSI "Aquarius" document mentioning MJ-12 (linked to Doty/Moore chain)

    Named in Bennewitz/Doty context. No authentic AFOSI release of an "Aquarius" MJ-12 document verified.

    7citations
  6. 06

    declassified CIA Psychological Strategy Board document

    Corpus cites a declassified CIA document on Psychological Strategy Board unifying psychological warfare — exact CREST id not spoken

    PSB was a real body; specific CREST id not given in transcript. real=false for the unnamed document.

    7citations
  7. 07

    Operation Upshot-Knothole declassified report

    Operation Upshot-Knothole (1953 Nevada Test Site nuclear test series) — mission/personnel reports

    Historical test series is real. Specific "declassified report" naming Stansel not retrieved.

    6citations
  8. 08

    Condon Committee / Condon Report

    Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects (University of Colorado / USAF contract; Bantam 1969); Air Force Study 44620Y67C-0035

    Identifier and archive location real (ncas.org Condon pages widely cited; archive.org full text exists). Full PDF not scraped this session — retrieved:false.

    5citations
  9. 09

    Project Sign / Project Grudge

    USAF Projects Sign (1948) and Grudge (1949) — predecessors to Blue Book

    Historically attested USAF projects; primary case files in Blue Book/NARA holdings. Not opened this session.

    5citations
  10. 10

    Pentacle memo

    Battelle Memorial Institute / Project Blue Book-related memo discovered by Jacques Vallée in Blue Book files (often called "Pentacle")

    Named in corpus (4 eps). Searched Firecrawl for primary PDF; returned secondary book citations (Vallée Forbidden Science) but no archival scan opened this session. real=true as a known Blue Book-file artifact discussed in literature; retrieved=false.

    4citations